Greeting, First of all, I would like to thank you for giving me a chance to ask about a thing that is important for my job in my company. I am working as a Contract Specialist in a Chinese company in Georgia on an international Construction Project. Our contract signed with the Employer is FIDIC MDB2010. Currently, as a Contractor, we have 9 months construction delay. However, the Contractor has 2 accepted claims that have a continuing effect: 1. Covid-19 epidemic claim (submitted under SC 8.4(d) and 8.5) 2. Right of Access to, and possession of the Site, which was delayed as a result of the failure of the Employer (submitted under SC 2.1). The Project scope is 10 km. The Contractor has possession of the Site for 9 km, but there is no possession for 1 km yet. The Contractor requests 9 months EoTfC without additional cost for the first claim that has been impacting the whole project works, and 7 months EoTfC with additional cost (plus profit) for the second claim that has been impacting only the works to be performed in the scope of aforesaid 1 km. My question: in case the Contractor is granted 9 months of EoTfC without cost for the claim of Covid-19 epidemic, can the Contractor be entitled to additional cost for the claim of right of access?