Are You Covered By Your Material Supplier’s Preliminary Notice? (Nope)

Don’t Rely on Another Party’s Notice

Parties that rely on their sub or supplier’s notice don’t receive any of the benefits described above. The notice doesn’t let others know that they’re on the job since notice informs top-tier parties of the sender’s presence on the job. Also, it does not contribute to the transparency or communication on the project – it creates a missing link in the payment chain. And finally: Another party’s preliminary notice doesn’t preserve your lien rights. When a preliminary notice is required, you must send it. Your sub or supplier sending one won’t protect your rights. The party who sends the notice protects their right to payment. Plain and simple.

This is true for monthly notices (when they’re required), too. Let’s take Texas for example. In Texas, a party might not need to send notice unless they’ve gone unpaid. However, to preserve lien rights in those situations, those unpaid parties must send monthly notices to protect unpaid amounts.

But if an unpaid contractor or sub thinks, “It’s ok. My supplier noticed this job,” they could be in for a rude awakening. That supplier may have preserved their right to lien, but their notice protects their lien rights – not anyone else’s.

Conclusion

So, are contractors or subs covered by the preliminary notice sent by the parties they hired? No. It’s that simple. Some states have no notice requirements, but most other states require them from certain parties. But it’s a good idea for all parties to send their own preliminary notice – regardless of whether it’s required. By relying on another party’s notice, your information could get lost in the shuffle, and you could be left empty-handed.

Summary

Article Name

Are You Covered By Your Material Supplier’s Preliminary Notice? (Nope)

Author

Wynton Yates

Publisher Name

Levelset

Publisher Logo