First and foremost, it is important to outline the issue. Yes, the plan set shows Both site lighting that is clearly in the original GMP and additional lighting “By Others”. Let’s discuss bullet point #5 first; Note: Owners claim they have email traffic from years ago that the GC were required to add lighting around the property, so the Owners claim this should be in the GC guarantee since the company knew. Yes, absolutely is site lighting in the plan design, it is shown in landscaping set, electrical set, architectural set and Civil set. There are Ballard lights and exterior building lights clearly shown and incorporated in the electrical drawings. Therefor any exterior lighting discussion that was called out to be implemented, was installed per plan. ( response to bullet point #2, What lights are being worked on that were required and contemplated in original design requests from city) In addition to the above mentioned exterior lighting, the plans show Pole lights “by others” and in this case the Local Power Company are clearly called out as the responsible party. There are no electrical layouts, details, power requirements, pedestal design, power supply, meter connection, etc. in the plan set that would suggest this was part of the GMP