Menu

Richard Foster

Attorney | Richard Foster Law
About Richard Foster
Richard’s law practice serves all of Florida with a primary area of Broward, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade Counties. His experience includes personal injury,
complex civil litigation matters, environmental and toxic tort litigation, commercial litigation, insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage disputes,
residential real estate matters, landlord tenant issues and criminal cases. Richard is licensed to practice law in Florida, New Jersey, New York, the District of
Columbia and before the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. For the past five years, Richard has been a NITA Trial Advocacy Faculty Member. As
an advocacy specialist, Richard provides his expertise to assist attorneys looking to hone their skills in the area of preparing and taking depositions to dMore...
More...
Richard Foster's Recent Answers
Oct 13, 2022
Oct 13, 2022
From an Anonymous Contractor
FloridaConstruction ContractPayment Disputes
Richard Foster
Attorney at Richard Foster Law
Yes, you would need a lawyer to assist in removing the lien. If the contractor is owed payment, you could negotiate payment to remove the lien from your
property instead.
See More...
Nov 7, 2022
Nov 7, 2022
From an Anonymous Contractor
FloridaPayment Disputes
Richard Foster
Attorney at Richard Foster Law
The bank cannot deposit a check dated a year out. You must get another check dated the same day or earlier for the bank to deposit it.See More...
Dec 15, 2022
From an Anonymous Contractor
FloridaMechanics Lien
Richard Foster
Attorney at Richard Foster Law
You will need to file a lawsuit to pursue your claim.See More...
Nov 6, 2022
From Gerald Reif
Florida
Richard Foster
Attorney at Richard Foster Law
I recommend you contact Jonathan Cohen, Esq.

https://www.jcohenpa.com/practice/fort-lauderdale-construction-lawyer/
See More...
Nov 3, 2022
From an Anonymous Contractor
FloridaLawsuit
Richard Foster
Attorney at Richard Foster Law
The short answer is no, there is not a viable civil case here against you. He did not use a work phone, it did not occur on the work site and there is no physical
harm or damages to derive a cause of action against you. However, criminal charges against your employee are certainly a viable option. I would
recommend terminating this employee immediately as it appears he would be a liability should something occur on the work site.
See More...