I am part of a staffing agency who supplied general labor to a company that was a subcontractor on a job. We filed a lien on June 14th 2017 and we have workers out on the job up until April 9th 2017. We sent 2/3 Month notices via certified mail also once the labor ceased (Account was suspended). It is my understanding that the lien should be valid, however I was reached out to by a person stating this: ""The Statute states that property owners are liable to a perfected lien only (1) the extent to which the owner withheld retainage from the original contractor, and (2) the extent to which the owner made payments to the original contractor after receiving fund-trapping notices from subcontractor(s). Above mentioned statute applied: 1) In order for Results (My company) to have a claim on the retainage the lien is statutorily required to be filed no less than 30 days after a project is abandoned. In this case Mid July is more than 30 days after Kuehn abandoned the project. We can evidence this by our having to pay a dumpster to be hauled off after Kuehn stopped communicating with us in May. Results would still have a claim if there was any retainage still paid/owed to Kuehn after their notice was sent, but in this case the entire 10% retainage amount was offset by unperformed, but paid for, work. 2) The first "fund trapping" notice LWORH received as Owners was, as stated in Results Lien Affidavit, June 14th 2017. We didn't make any payments to Kuehn after mid may as a result of their abandonment. Therefore there is not claim available for "trapped funds" either."" I am not familiar with this "30 day" rule of abandonment that he is speaking of above. Can you advise if this is a valid statement?